Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇÕÂø¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø½Ã¸àÆ®·Î ÇÕÂøÇÑ Machinable Ceramic°ú »ó¾ÆÁú »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÎÀå°­µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸

TENSILE STRENGTH BETWEEN MACHINABLE CERAMIC AND DENTIN CEMENTED WITH LUTING COMPOSITE RESIN CEMENTS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.487 ~ 501
Á¶º´ÈÆ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶º´ÈÆ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract


In the case of CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restorations, if isthmus width is widened too much, it may cause fracture of remaining tooth structure or loss of bonding at the luting interface because of excessive displacement of buccal or lingual cusps under occlusal loads. So to clarify the criterior of widening isthmus width, this study was designed to test the tensile bond strength and bond failure mode between dentin and ceramic cemented with luting composite resin cements. Cylindrical ceramic blocks ( Vita Cerec Mark II, d = 4mm ) were bonded to buccal dentin of 40 freshly extracted third molars with 4 luting composite resin cements (group 1 : Scotchbond Resin Cement/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, group2 : Duolink Resin Cement/All-Bond 2, group3 : Bistite Resin Cement/Ceramics Primer, and group4 : Superbond C & B) . Tensile bond test was done under universal testing machine using bonding and measuring alignment blocks(¥Õ ilo & Um, 1992). After immersion of fractured samples into 1% methylene blue for 24 hours, failure mode was analysed under stereomicroscope and SEM. Results : The tensile bond strength of goup 1, 2 & 4 was 13.97¡¾ 2.90 MPa, 16.49¡¾3.90 MPa and 16.17¡¾4.32 MPa, respectively. There was no statistical differences (p>0.05). But, group 3 showed significantly lower bond stregnth ( 5.98 ¡¾ 1.17 MPa, p<0.05). In almost all samples, adhesive fractures between dentin and resin cements were observed. But, in group 1, 2 & 4, as bond strength increased, cohesive fracture within resin cement was observed simultaneously. And, in group 3, as bond strength decreased, cohesive fracture between hybrid layer and composite resin cement was--also observed. Cohesive fracture within dentin and porcelain adhesive fracture were not observed. In conclusion, although adhesive cements were used in CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic inlay restorations, the conservative priciples of cavity preparation must be obligated.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI